Kaja Juvan vs Justina Mikulskyte Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How crucial is the second serve performance in determining the favorite in a tennis match? Over the past six months, Mikulskyte has had a second serve win rate of 38.56%, while Juvan has clinched 45.3% of points in the same category. This statistic often sways predictions significantly in favor of the player with a stronger second serve performance.

What about their prowess in return games? Recent analyses show that Mikulskyte has won 51.64% of points on opponents' second serves, slightly edging out Juvan's 50.94%. When it comes to first serve returns, Mikulskyte maintains a narrow lead with 31.61% compared to Juvan's 30.13%. These figures provide insights into who might have the upper hand in the return game battles.

In the heat of the match, who performs better under pressure? Mikulskyte seems to have a knack for saving breakpoints, with a save rate of 50.98%, compared to Juvan's 42.4%. This might be a crucial factor for those engaging in in-game betting, as saving breakpoints can often turn the tide of a game.

Lately, how have these players been faring overall? Mikulskyte's record shows she has won 57.83% of her matches (W/L 48/35) over the past year, while Juvan has a slightly better win rate at 66.67% (W/L 10/5). These statistics illuminate the general form and resilience of each player.

How about surface preferences? Clay appears to be the preferred court for both, with Mikulskyte achieving a 62% win rate and Juvan excelling even further with 73%. In contrast, Mikulskyte struggles on grass, having never won a match (W/L 0/3), while Juvan finds the indoor hard surface her least favorable, holding a 54% win rate (W/L 22/19).

Delving into player level, both have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Mikulskyte claimed victory in 59.26% of her matches (W/L 48/33), while Juvan pulled ahead with a 70% success rate (W/L 7/3). Yet the difference in the quality of opponents faced sheds light on their paths, with Mikulskyte encountering slightly higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 244.17, whereas Juvan faced those averaging at 342.4.

Should the match head into a deciding set, historical performance in such scenarios can be predictive. Mikulskyte boasts a robust 69% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, slightly outpacing Juvan's 67%. Such insights could be beneficial for live predictions, adding another layer to match expectations.

When it comes to break point conversion, Mikulskyte has made more of her opportunities, successfully converting 44.15% of breakpoints. Juvan, on the other hand, lagged behind with 38.04%. This critical indicator could forecast which player is more likely to capitalize on key moments during the match.

After amassing the statistics and comparing both players' profiles, Juvan appears marginally ahead due to her superior overall win rate, particularly on clay. Juvan might have the edge, although Mikulskyte's knack for saving breakpoints cannot be ignored. However, Juvan’s consistent performance might just tip the scales in her favor for this encounter.